Journal article icon

Journal article

Secularisation and the securitisation of the sacred a response to Lewin’s framing of the Gearon–Jackson debate

Abstract:

In this article, I make a response to Lewin’s insightful and judicious contribution to the Author–Jackson debate. I address the central and important arguments made by Lewin in relation to three aspects of my theoretical orientations on religion in education: (1) what Lewin rightly identifies as my ‘propositional’ interpretation of religion; (2) the politicisation of religion as secularisation; and (3) the securitisation of religion in education as a ‘securitisation of the sacred’. I argue so...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1080/00071005.2017.1363375

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Oxford college:
Harris Manchester College
Role:
Author
More from this funder
Funding agency for:
Gearon, L
More from this funder
Funding agency for:
Gearon, L
Publisher:
Routledge Publisher's website
Journal:
British Journal of Educational Studies Journal website
Volume:
65
Issue:
4
Pages:
469-480
Publication date:
2017-08-10
Acceptance date:
2017-08-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1467-8527
ISSN:
0007-1005
Source identifiers:
724884
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:724884
UUID:
uuid:9fea95dc-a3de-49e7-8363-b19182343a5d
Local pid:
pubs:724884
Deposit date:
2017-09-08

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP