Journal article icon

Journal article

Discriminatory conscientious objections in healthcare: A response to Ancell and Sinnott-Armstrong

Abstract:

Aaron Ancell and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (A&SA;) propose a pragmatic approach to problems arising from conscientious objections in healthcare. Their primary focus is on private healthcare systems like that in the United States. A&SA; defend three claims: (i) many conscientious objections in healthcare are morally permissible and should be lawful, (ii) conscientious objections that involve invidious discrimination are morally impermissible, but (iii) even invidiously-discriminatory co...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1017/S0963180119000124

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Philosophy Faculty
Role:
Author
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press Publisher's website
Journal:
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics Journal website
Volume:
28
Issue:
2
Pages:
316-326
Publication date:
2019-05-22
Acceptance date:
2019-02-10
DOI:
EISSN:
1469-2147
ISSN:
0963-1801
Source identifiers:
974863
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:974863
UUID:
uuid:766da15e-e2c5-41be-bb8b-3658ca3a6101
Local pid:
pubs:974863
Deposit date:
2019-02-20

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP