Journal article icon

Journal article

How are progression decisions made following external randomised pilot trials? A qualitative interview study and framework analysis

Abstract:

Background External randomised pilot trials help researchers decide whether, and how, to do a future definitive randomised trial. The progression criteria are often prespecified to inform the interpretation of pilot trial findings and subsequent progression decision-making. We aimed to explore and understand the perspectives and experiences of key stakeholders when making progression decisions following external pilot trials. Methods Thirty-five remote semi-structured interviews with externa...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1186/s13063-022-06063-9

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Oxford college:
St Edmund Hall
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-4054-5975
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Sub department:
Botnar Research Centre
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6881-6984
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-1036-6626
Medical Research Council More from this funder
Publisher:
BioMed Central Publisher's website
Journal:
Trials Journal website
Volume:
23
Article number:
132
Publication date:
2022-02-10
Acceptance date:
2022-01-29
DOI:
EISSN:
1745-6215
Pmid:
35144670
Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1239168
Local pid:
pubs:1239168
Deposit date:
2022-02-25

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP