Journal article
Reply to Vinken and Vogels
- Abstract:
-
In their comment, Vinken and Vogels [1] take issue with our claim [2] that "IT neurons encode long-term, latent probabilistic information about stimulus occurrence". They offer a biologically plausible model of our findings, which they argue is based on neuronal fatigue. However, like our account, their model includes latent variables that are modulated slowly with stimulus probability; models without such latent processes, such as those based on temporally local fatigue effects, cannot expla...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Accepted manuscript, pdf, 808.4KB)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.021
Authors
Funding
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Elsevier Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Current Biology Journal website
- Volume:
- 27
- Issue:
- 22
- Pages:
- R1212-R1213
- Publication date:
- 2017-11-20
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-10-21
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1879-0445
- ISSN:
-
0960-9822
- Pmid:
-
29161557
- Source identifiers:
-
803382
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:803382
- UUID:
-
uuid:36f6c4a8-b611-4db3-a002-da012982285b
- Local pid:
- pubs:803382
- Deposit date:
- 2019-05-13
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Elsevier
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Elsevier at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.021
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record