Journal article : Review
Design, methods, and reporting of impact studies of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules are suboptimal: a systematic review
ObjectivesTo evaluate design, methods, and reporting of impact studies of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules (CPRs).
Study Design and SettingWe conducted a systematic review. Impact studies of cardiovascular CPRs were identified by forward citation and electronic database searches. We categorized the design of impact studies as appropriate for randomized and nonrandomized experiments, excluding uncontrolled before-after study. For impact... Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Publisher copy:
- Copyright holder:
- Elsevier Inc.
- Copyright date:
- Rights statement:
- © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Elsevier at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.016
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record