Reference: T. J. Mawson, ['2001-June']. Eternal truths and Cartesian circularity. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 9 (2), 197-220
Citable link to this page: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:470a2dae-494f-4c2c-8cb4-85fc80ac7b05Abstract: 'Voluntarism casts no useful light on those aspects of the Meditations that have received the most attention: the truth rule, divine veracity, the relation between those, the Cartesian Circle' (Bennett). In this paper, I shall draw together various strands from recent Descartes scholarship to argue that this is entirely false. When Descartes' voluntarism is understood as central to his epistemological project, not only does it allow us to make more sense of what he says on all these issues, but also it allows us to see what he says, on certain assumptions, unassailable. The only difficulty that then remains is that these assumptions are widely held to be necessarily false.
| Publication status: | Published |
| Peer Review status: | Peer reviewed |
| Version: | Updated Author's Original |
| Notes: | Citation: Mawson, T. J. (2001). 'Eternal truths and Cartesian circularity', British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 9(2), 197-220. This is an electronic version of an article published in the British Journal for the History of Philosophy (available online at http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=09608788&volume=9&issue=2&spage=197 |
| Keywords: |
| Subjects: |
| Member of collection : | Journal Articles |