ORA Basic Item: "Favoured or oppressed? Married women, property and ‘coverture’ in England, 1660–1800" - uuid:1fb06fca-b2ed-4e25-afe6-8808607c6384
Please update your bookmark to this page, as it is using the older form of link
Tinyurl.com link: http://tinyurl.com/63b83d

ORA Basic Item: "Favoured or oppressed? Married women, property and ‘coverture’ in England, 1660–1800"

Member of collection Journal Articles

Reference: Bailey, Joanne , (2002). Favoured or oppressed? Married women, property and ‘coverture’ in England, 1660–1800 .

Link to this archived copy: http://ora.ouls.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:1fb06fca-b2ed-4e25-afe6-8808607c6384
 
Title Favoured or oppressed? Married women, property and ‘coverture’ in England, 1660–1800 ;
Creator Bailey, Joanne ;
Date 2002 ;
Description In the eighteenth century, the condition of English wives under ‘coverture’ was both defended as one of privilege and attacked as worse than slavery. This article suggests that married women were not in reality confined within coverture’s regulations on credit and property ownership. Their economic activities were fairly broad and flexible and they had an instinctive sense of possession over some goods during wedlock, perceiving their contributions to marriage as a pooling of resources for familial benefit. It will be suggested that wives did not necessarily think that their conduct in acting as if some marital property was legally theirs was illegitimate, because it was facilitated by coverture and the legal devices that allowed it to function. ;
Subject Modern History ;
Publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP) ;
Relation Continuity and Change 17(3): 351-372. ;
Identifier(s)
Language ||| ;
Type software, multimedia ; Journal (Paginated) ;
Downloads

JOURNAL.pdf Item

Terms of Use

The copyright of this item rests with the author and/or other copyright holder(s).

Click here for our Terms of Use